tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3685907526691141099.post3596760611709182560..comments2024-03-05T09:28:47.377-06:00Comments on Tails Through Time: The Most Ambitious UAV Ever: Quartz/AARSJP Santiagohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02743418658732808826noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3685907526691141099.post-34335805853787378212015-12-06T02:55:10.559-06:002015-12-06T02:55:10.559-06:00nice sharenice sharedroneziehttp://dronezie.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3685907526691141099.post-27037528542870847072014-04-29T18:08:54.465-05:002014-04-29T18:08:54.465-05:00http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/to...http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,511.0/all.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3685907526691141099.post-80242746593639754892012-10-26T11:17:00.057-05:002012-10-26T11:17:00.057-05:00Quartz came from medium sized early Senior Peg sub...Quartz came from medium sized early Senior Peg submission although the combined Boeong/Lockheed effort probaly has very little in common with the Senior Peg. BTW, what the heck was the purpose of a rear tail on senior peg? Northrop got a way with a pure wing design for Senior Ice/B2A? Why couldn't Lockheed? I also read a quote from Ben Rich that the final senior peg had a single verticle tail while the pictures of pole models show canted-twin tails? Twin tails would work just as good, why would they need a single verticle or single canted tail?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com